|
By: Dana Duthie, GM
Donala Water and Sanitation District
Since the November newsletter went out I have received several
notes, emails and phone calls about our water supply, rationing and
growth control. I have spoken to several groups, and I’m available
at any time to explain our current position and plans for the
future. This paper is intended to set the record straight and
explain our long range water plans.
The Problem:
We know and have always maintained that our source of water is
depleting and non-renewable. The Denver Basin of aquifers is often
described as “Lake Erie” underground. That is very misleading,
because although there may indeed be that much water down there, it
cannot all be retrieved without drilling many more wells deeper and
deeper, and eventually reaching a degree of marginal returns. The
State Engineer (SEO) sets our water supply by permit at 100 years
from the time the water was adjudicated in court. In most cases
that was within the last 20 years, leaving at least 80 years of
water on paper. It basically sets an amount of water under the land
that we cover, and our current total is about 2500 acre feet (over
814 million gallons) that can be used every year for the duration of
the 80 years. The county further restricts some development to a
300 year water supply, basically saying the development must have
three times as much water available than the SEO’s allocation. That
only affects a very small portion of our district, because it is not
enforced on areas platted before 1986. If indeed we had 80 years
left, most of you wouldn’t care. Your children wouldn’t care. It
would be many generations before anyone would be concerned.
However, your Board of Directors cannot work that way. We must look
for a renewable and lasting source of water to leave to the
generations that follow us while there is water out there to be
had. Most importantly however, the rate of depletion of the aquifer
makes the time line even more critical, and it is obvious that we
don’t have 80 years.
I am
always asked “How long do we have?” I wish I could answer that
question. The fact is that hydrology and geology are what I call
“soft sciences.” The only “hard” evidence we have about the water
down there comes from a well log when a well is drilled.
Unfortunately, because of the strata layers in the aquifers, what is
true about a well in one spot can be completely different a mile
away. That is why we have recently found that the wells in Woodmoor
are depleting much faster than those in Donala. The other major
factor in the depletion rate is the number of wells in close
proximity. As the growth around us continues, more wells are
drilled to support it. The cones of influence of those wells
overlap, and the result is a faster depletion rate all around.
The Solution:
It
is for all of these reasons that all of the districts and towns in
northern El Paso County have been working together for the past 3-4
years to solve our problem. We formed the Palmer Divide Water Group
for the sole purpose of finding a renewable source of water. We are
about to “graduate” to a Water Authority to give us more power and
the ability to actually start projects. We are cooperating to
extend the life of our wells and to find a source to replace them.
No one of us can go it on our own. The water and the infrastructure
needed to deliver it to your tap will be very expensive. We need
the pooled resources of all of our systems to make it work, and even
then we will probably have to enter into public-private partnerships
to get the job done.
So
what are we doing? We have commissioned an engineering study to
help point us in the right direction, but the general thrust is in
four inter-related areas. First is the conservation plan announced
in Donala’s November newsletter. All of us are following the same
program – every third day watering and encouraging xeriscaping. A
formal conservation plan is mandatory to get state and federal
funding for some of the projects we are looking at. It is also
becoming paramount before we can convince those who have the water –
the Western Slope – that we are maximizing our own resources, and we
need their help. It is not enough that Donala has a graduated water
rate (those who use the most pay the most) and that we use reclaimed
water on the golf course. We need to do more. We need to convince
the folks with huge plots of bluegrass that they need to cut back.
A good conservation plan will increase the life of our aquifer
system.
Secondly, we need to maximize the use of the water we have. It
comes from deep in the ground. It is ours until we put it in
Monument Creek and lose it downstream. Then it becomes surface
water that is owned by downstream users with historic rights. If we
can keep it up here, or at least claim credit for it and sell it to
downstream users, we need to do so. We are looking at ways to use
the reclaimed water from the creek for irrigation and even potable
use. Our engineering study is geared to show us the way.
Next, because of the phenomenon of overlapping cones of influence,
we need to find a way to manage our wells. That might include using
a satellite well field, pumping from areas outside our immediate
vicinity and bringing it in, again, extending the life of our wells
and aquifers. This is sort of a “band-aid” that will give us the
time to accomplish the final step of bringing in the renewable
water. It will also help us “drought proof” our supply – at least
for many years. As you remember, Colorado Springs and others on
“snow melt” water were severely affected by the drought, while we
were able to keep pumping. The longer we can extend the life of the
aquifer, the longer we will have a supply that augments our
renewable source when its quantity is limited by drought.
Finally, our thrust is to find and deliver the renewable surface
water source. We have already started by entering into an agreement
with a developer who is planning on expanding the Brush Hollow
Reservoir and another storage area on the Arkansas River. By
getting in on the ground floor of his project we are guaranteed a
“bucket” in which to put the water we will be negotiating to
deliver. We are often asked “Why build a reservoir if you don’t
have the water?” It is a chicken or the egg question. With surface
water one has to have a place to store it. In fact, we will be
looking for a site in our immediate area to build the “bucket” to
receive the water before we treat and deliver it. The opportunity
to get on board with the Brush Hollow project is now, and if we
don’t act now, we will lose it.
In
the meantime, we are working with other entities to enter into
agreements to buy agricultural water. The farmers on the Arkansas
are in dire straights. They can’t compete with the Central American
countries and even Texas, California and Florida – areas that
produce two to three growing seasons a year. The Arkansas valley
has been over-farmed to a degree that the water is high in salinity,
and the recent court case giving much of the water they used to
Kansas has led many farms to go bankrupt. They know however, that
they have a valuable resource in at least the quantity of water they
own. Many of them are willing to sell out and retire. However,
drying up the farms in Colorado is a very politically sensitive
subject. It is not accepted well in many circles, and although the
farmers own most of the water on the Front Range, the communities
that need it for residential, commercial and industrial use are
having a hard time finding a strong voice of support. That fact is
not likely to get much better – at least not until the shortage gets
to a point where real estate values start going down and/or folks
get real thirsty.
One
program we are working on to make the whole issue more palatable is
“rotating fallowing.” It is done in California, where water is even
more valuable than it is here. The concept pays the farmer to hold
a portion of his acreage out of production for a season, and selling
or leasing that water to the buyers like us. The farm stays in
business. In fact, the price the farmer gets for that water is more
than he would get for the crops grown on that part of his farm. It
still has the label of “drying up” part of the farms. That is the
issue we have to overcome, and why we are binding with others to
have a loud enough voice to be heard.
Once
we have the water, we will have to find a way to collect it, or
trade it up stream, so that it gets into the Brush Hollow
Reservoir. There it will be used a couple of times to generate
hydro-electric power (for which we will be paid for at least the
last time through), and then it is transferred down to Stonewall
Springs, a gravel quarry. There it may or may not be treated for
its salinity and then pumped up a pipeline to our local area and
another reservoir. From there we will treat it to potable standards
and deliver it to your tap.
As
you can imagine, all this is very expensive. Although Donala has
some money in reserve, and the election of May, 2006 allowed us to
keep more for this purpose, the millions of dollars required to
purchase the water, build the pipelines and treatment plants, and
construct a reservoir will be substantial. Our “Taxpayers’ Report”
on the donalawater.org website shows you the status of your tax
money and how we are being “good shepherds” with your money to
achieve these goals.
What We Cannot Do:
Donala cannot control growth in our area. As a Donala homeowner I
understand and sympathize with many about the rapid growth in our
neighborhood, its affects on traffic, schools and the general
quality of life. However, the water district board can only concern
itself with the effect of growth on our water supply. Having said
that, it is not the responsibility of the district to control
growth based on a limited water supply. Our charter calls for us to
provide the best water service we can to the LANDOWNERS of the
district. “Landowners” means the owners of undeveloped land as well
as the residents of finished homes. They have deeded their water to
us to serve them, and we must do so under the guidelines set forth
by the state and the county. It is also important to note that
Donala is almost built out. There is some commercial property along
Struthers Road yet to be developed, and the Brown Ranch off of
Roller Coaster Road. Because of the water supply the Ranch brought
to the table, we are restricting them to 60 patio homes and 30 2 ½
acre lots. They have no immediate development plans at this time.
Limiting or controlling growth is a political decision that can only
be made (in our case) by the County Commissioners and the Monument
Town Council. We have no rights other than to voice our opinions
and squeal for help. In reality, what we would be asking for is the
use of the water underneath the land that other developers own,
rather than let them develop themselves. Hardly a fair request. As
mentioned previously, the projects that will be required in this
endeavor will be very expensive. To that end, the commercial growth
planned in the area becomes very important. Although you may not
believe it every year when you get your property tax bill, single
and multi-family homeowners don’t pay enough in taxes to fund the
kind of projects we are talking about. We need the commercial and
industrial tax base to pull it off. For that reason the growth
around us is a good thing. Our cooperation and coordination with our
neighbors in the area is paramount, and although their growth may
indeed be part of the problem, it is also part of the solution. It
is an inevitable fact of life we all have to understand or accept.
The only other solution is to buy up all the land around us and live
in isolation. I would submit to you – it is too late for that. The
other, painful fact is that the depletion in the aquifers is
happening with or without growth. It is a fact that the Denver and
Arapahoe aquifers do not replenish themselves. It is also a fact
that the water migrates laterally, and if we don’t use it, someone
else will.
As
always, I am available to discuss this concept and any of these
issues in any forum you wish. You can contact me at the Donala
office at 488-3603, or by email at
d2donala@earthlink.net. |